Affordable housing how does it work

In addition, the need to rethink work and housing after the COVID pandemic makes this challenge even more pressing. Focusing on affordable housing investment would provide a much-needed opportunity for job creation in the construction industry, especially in high-cost metropolitan areas. As the analysis presented in this report indicates, in any given metropolitan area, there may be jurisdictions that perform better than others in terms of the jobs-housing fit. Usually, clusters of low-wage jobs cross the boundaries of individual jurisdictions.

Furthermore, peripheral areas are often the only options available to low-income families but are not well connected to both central and suburban job-rich areas. Therefore, addressing any poor jobs-housing fit ought to be a regional effort. CAP recommends the federal government make a large-scale direct investment in metropolitan land trusts on which equitable transit-oriented developments can be established, particularly in areas where the low-wage jobs-affordable housing fit is poor, in proximity to low-wage job hot spots, and where public transit connects the low-wage workforce to clusters of low-wage jobs.

MLTs would be a metropolitanwide version of community land trusts CLTs : nonprofit community-based organizations that acquire land within a specified geographic area, removing it from the speculative real estate market by retaining ownership of the land in perpetuity.

CLTs then lease the land to homeowners or other entities that own the buildings developed on the land, including, among others, nonprofit developers of rental housing. The housing is then provided to tenants at permanently affordable rents. MLTs would be locally organized consortia formed through the partnership of existing CLTs; local government housing and transportation agencies; local housing authorities; mission-driven nonprofit organizations; and community development financial institutions.

The consortia would be governed by a combination of members and local officials and overseen by the U. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD to prevent housing discrimination and to ensure the proper use of funds.

Through these partnerships, MLTs would increase their capacity, diversify their holdings to include rental housing and mixed-use development, and maximize the overall number of affordable units throughout a metropolitan area, especially in job-rich areas where the demand for affordable housing is strong.

On the other hand, eTODs apply an equity lens to the traditional TODs in order to ensure that the benefits of TODs accrue to low- and moderate-income families rather than predominantly to high-income residents. The concept of TOD emerged in the late s when architect and urban planner Peter Calthorpe coined the term to refer to a compact, walkable, mixed-use community developed near transit services and with good access to jobs, services, and amenities. Most importantly, high development costs and scarce land supply often contribute to an increase in property values within and around TODs, which in turn create barriers to entry for low-income residents, increase their probability of experiencing a housing cost burden, or lead to their displacement and to gentrification.

Property values tend to increase in anticipation of transit development. Several localities, including some of the metropolitan areas analyzed in this report, have been promoting the development and preservation of affordable housing in TODs through a variety of funding streams.

Given the persistent shortage of affordable housing and poor accessibility to employment centers in these areas, however, much work still needs to be done and brought to a larger scale. Land in TODs tends to be more expensive than land outside them. MLTs that are established with substantial subsidies, incentives, and regulatory assistance by the federal government could help address these challenges and ensure that housing in eTODs is affordable for many low-income workers and their families in the long run and at the needed scale.

Some more recommendations are provided below. The high fixed costs associated with land acquisition and construction represent a major barrier for both the establishment of MLTs and the development of affordable housing in eTODs.

For MLTs and eTODs to achieve scale, it is necessary to aggressively subsidize the costs of land acquisition and development. Reducing the costs of construction of eTOD housing would ensure that a larger amount of affordable housing units can be injected in the housing market compared with the amount of affordable housing created with current funding channels.

Federal transportation policies typically prioritize spending on highway projects rather than transit investments. The latter generally require very large contributions by states and local government. A critical element of the program would be the requirement that a portion of the funding is set aside for the establishment and expansion of MLTs stewarding land on which eTODs can be developed. States should adopt lasting affordability in their qualified allocation plans for the LIHTC program, thus giving MLTs a greater opportunity to be considered for this type of funding.

Considering the regulatory environment in which affordable housing is incentivized, planned, and produced is critical for affordable rental units to be strategically located where they are needed the most: close to jobs and to rapid transit corridors and hubs. An explicit governmental mandate that requires developers to provide affordable housing units in eTODs is necessary for affordable housing to be tactically produced at the needed scale.

States should allocate affordable housing obligations to every jurisdiction, with appropriate incentives, such as density bonuses, for jurisdictions located in regions with significant current and projected job growth. Some states already have housing and land-use policies that promote affordable housing development in areas of opportunity.

Some of these policies are the result of court-ordered mandates, and sometimes they override local zoning or planning board decisions. In addition, tying housing development funds to transportation programs, along with administrative incentives and the judicial threat of a court-ordered requirement, would put teeth to the compliance process.

For example, noncompliant communities would not be eligible for various federal and state loans and grants, whereas compliant localities and metropolitan areas would receive priority in funding.

Existing CLTs focus predominantly on homeownership. It is important that MLTs become more involved largely in the development and stewardship of rental housing, especially for the low-income workforce. This proportion should represent at least 70 percent of all eTOD units developed throughout a metropolitan area. Increasing allowable densities on MLT land on which eTODs are developed, along with other cost-reducing strategies such as lowering parking requirements and streamlining the permitting process, would support a larger set-aside of affordable housing units.

The availability of developable land represents a significant challenge, especially in high-cost and dense areas. To support the co-establishment of MLTs and eTODs, however, there are some opportunities and best practices that could be followed.

For instance, local governments could facilitate the acquisition by MLTs of old commercial zones, such as underused parking lots and idle or decaying malls and business corridors. Also, public transit agencies could provide property at discounted prices or transfer surplus land assets to local governments for the establishment of MLTs.

In Seattle, for instance, Sound Transit has committed to converting surplus property that has been acquired for transit expansion into affordable housing as part of current TOD initiatives.

As Hickey emphasizes, public transit expansions provide CLTs an opportunity to acquire land before investment in transit stations, new amenities, and infrastructure increase land values and make housing unaffordable for low- and moderate-income families. Regional economies cannot function without lower-wage workers. Therefore, addressing housing affordability for this segment of the workforce is essential to ensure a rapid economic recovery after the COVID pandemic and continued regional economic dynamism.

It is important from a social equity perspective to ensure that low-wage workers benefit from economic recovery, job growth, and economic development. The mere addition of new jobs to metropolitan areas with strong economies cannot ensure that all residents have equal access to economic opportunities unless the supply of affordable units to house the local workforce is sufficient. Furthermore, the shortage of affordable housing undermines the economic competitiveness and productivity of metropolitan areas, as high housing costs affect the ability of regional economies to attract new firms and businesses and expand existing ones.

She has extensive research, teaching, and consulting experience in housing and community development. She has published work on the government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-lending practices of ethnic-owned banks in immigrant communities, jobs-housing imbalance in minority communities, residential segregation, and poverty and housing affordability. Spencer, Andres Vinelli, and Will White. Michela Zonta. Christian E. Karla Walter. In this article.

InProgress Stay updated on our work on the most pressing issues of our time. Specifically, this report recommends the following: Create a federal regulatory and funding mechanism that aligns new and existing transportation funding with affordable housing production for states that promote the establishment of MLTs in which eTODs can be developed. Create state mandates for inclusionary housing—that is to say, programs that tap the economic gains from rising real estate values to expand affordable rental and ownership opportunities for low- and moderate-income families.

Ensure that local governments facilitate the acquisition of developable land by MLTs. A persistent spatial mismatch for American low-wage workers. Rather, a jobs-housing fit is more appropriate because, from an equity perspective, it is important to match the wage levels of local jobs and the affordability of local housing: 51 Because high-income workers inherently have more flexibility and choice in terms of their housing location decisions, and because of the dynamics of suburban housing markets, this is a problem that manifests primarily in suburban locations that tend to underprovide affordable housing options for low-wage workers.

Low-wage jobs and affordable rental housing in 15 metropolitan areas. Miami Miami is characterized by deep spatial inequalities, with affluent residents living along the coast, in and around downtown, and close to knowledge-based businesses and institutions, whereas low-income households, especially people of color, reside in pockets of concentrated poverty located in the suburban periphery and with poor access to good-paying jobs.

Denver The Denver metropolitan area followed the typical auto-oriented Sun Belt city development pattern during the 20th century as it experienced intense sprawl and city-center population decline up until the mids. Austin The Austin, Texas, metropolitan area represents a major high-tech hub—information technology, telecommunications, and business and financial services—and is home to several large and small technology companies.

Seattle The Seattle metropolitan area is among the U. San Antonio The San Antonio metropolitan area features a diverse economy. Nashville Nashville, Tennessee, is a center for sports, entertainment, and hospitality. Charlotte Like Austin, the Charlotte, North Carolina, metropolitan area has been growing fast in recent years. Grand Rapids While it had lost Takeaway In summary, low-wage jobs are not evenly distributed throughout each metropolitan area analyzed in this report.

Invest in MLTs for the establishment of eTODs As the analysis presented in this report indicates, in any given metropolitan area, there may be jurisdictions that perform better than others in terms of the jobs-housing fit.

Retsinas and Eric S. Belsky, eds. Rental Housing Policy. Peter Ganong and Daniel W. Vincent A. Fusaro and H. A study of janitors in Silicon Valley, for example, shows that these workers often choose to live closer to work.

See, for example, Kenneth T. Massey and Nancy A. This is particularly common among people of color, as the spatial mismatch literature indicates. John F. Keith R. Ihlanfeldt and David L. Commentators have argued that after the Great Recession. Most importantly, the jobs recovery has been geographically uneven. While in some areas the growth of low-wage jobs has paralleled the growth of high-wage jobs, in other places low-wage jobs have dominated the jobs recovery.

David H. Steven Raphael and Michael A. See also Kevin M. The report indicates that 61 percent of census tracts with poverty rates higher than 20 percent and 55 percent of majority-minority neighborhoods experienced declines in job proximity between and Furthermore, the number of jobs near the typical Hispanic and Black resident in major metropolitan areas declined much more steeply than for white residents.

Patricia Gober, Kevin E. The notion of exclusionary zoning refers to policies that prevent affordable housing from being developed in wealthy and middle-class neighborhoods characterized by access to education, employment, and other opportunities.

Exclusionary zoning typically keeps low-income families, particularly families of color, from moving to opportunity-rich neighborhoods through land-use and building code requirements.

For example, requirements applied to minimum lot sizes, single residences per lot, and other building codes make it difficult to build multifamily rental units in wealthy neighborhoods. John M. Quigley and Larry A. What Can We Learn? Benner and Karner calculated the metric at two different geographic scales: the census place and census tract levels. Calculations at the place level would call attention to jurisdictions with a shortage of affordable housing relative to the local demand for low-wage labor.

Most notably, it lets poor families decide for themselves what tradeoffs they want to make around building quality, location, price, and all the other relevant factors.

But there are also several problems. One is funding. Due to Congress's reluctance to appropriate large sums of money for housing assistance, the number of families who meet the eligibility criteria generally far exceeds the number of vouchers actually available. That leads to long waiting lists for families seeking help. Another is that landlords often prefer not to rent to Section 8 tenants, recreating the social isolation dynamic of public housing projects that Section 8 is supposed to mitigate.

Exclusionary zoning is a process by which a neighborhood or town makes it de facto illegal for low-income — or at times even non-poor — people to live in a given area.

The most blunt form is something like a ban on trailer parks or mobile homes. More subtle forms of exclusionary zoning are also available. In Washington, DC's Spring Valley neighborhood, for example, homes must be located on lots that are at least 7, square feet.

Minimum lot size rules are extremely common in America's suburbs, as are bans on multi-family structures. These kinds of measures, whether deliberately or unintentionally, make it impossible to locate cheap housing in the areas where it's applied.

Requirements that housing units include off-street parking can also serve as a form of exclusion , as carless households are disproportionately low-income. It is true that the densest county in America, Manhattan, is not exactly cheap. Nor is San Francisco, the second-densest city in the county. But the right question to ask is how much more expensive would these places be with less density.

Suppose every apartment building on Fifth Avenue and Central Park West were reduced in height by 20 percent. Rich people would still like park views. But all that rich-person money would be chasing fewer units. Prices would rise. And the rich people who got priced out of Fifth Avenue would fan out across the city raising prices elsewhere. Conversely, if San Francisco were allowed to be built up to New York City levels of density it could fit another 1. For starters, there are only so many people to go around.

If rezoning were to cause some cities to become more crowded, it stands to reason that some other place is becoming less crowded. Different people will have different preferences about levels of crowding and will choose to live in different neighborhoods or different metropolitan areas.

More broadly, the fact that many people don't like too much crowding is precisely why we don't need to worry too much about prescriptive residential land use rules. There is no reason to build a dense parcel unless someone wants to rent or buy it. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding.

Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Share this story Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share All sharing options Share All sharing options for: Everything you need to know about the affordable housing debate. Reddit Pocket Flipboard Email. What's affordable housing?

How does the government define affordable housing? What's wrong with the official definition of affordable housing? How can we make housing more affordable? There are two basic types of policies that could make a large difference in housing affordability: First, the government could directly give money or discounted housing to low-income families.

Obviously a family that receives a free house can now afford housing. By the same token, families that receive more money can afford a wider range of houses. Second, policymakers could increase the number of dwellings in a given metropolitan area. This could be done either by relaxing restrictions on the size of buildings that can be built, or by relaxing restrictions that mandate minimum sizes of individual dwelling units.

Cities tend to have a number of zoning rules that artificially restrict the supply of housing. Why is increasing supply so central to affordability? What is zoning? How does rent control impact housing affordability? What is inclusionary zoning? What is gentrification? What is filtering? Won't unregulated developers just produce tons of luxury housing? Whatever happened to public housing? What is Section 8? It also boosts spending and employment in the surrounding economy, brings revenue into local governments and reduces the likelihood of foreclosure.

Here at Iceni Homes, we have been the driving force behind an array of affordable housing projects across the East of England. We will continue to do our best to uniquely deliver expert housing solutions alongside our brilliant collaborative partners: Eastlight Community Homes and Hundred Houses.

Take a look at some of the projects that we have carried out and are currently working on by checking out our Projects Page here. Another successful project managed by Iceni Homes has come to fruition. Iceni Homes is looking ahead to the future after becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of growing housing association Eastlight Community Homes.

The transfer will enable It's hard to believe we're heading into the Christmas season once again, after what we are sure will be the most unusual year most If you haven't already, please follow our new Linkedin page at linkedin. Just a reminder that this Twitter account will soon be closed. Iceni Homes will be moving to EastlightHomes where you will be able to stay up to date with the latest news and get in touch with us.

We look forward to seeing you all there.